<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Research Project | Giulia Solinas</title><link>https://giuliasolinas.github.io/tags/research-project/</link><atom:link href="https://giuliasolinas.github.io/tags/research-project/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Research Project</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Coordination in organizations</title><link>https://giuliasolinas.github.io/projects/coordination/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://giuliasolinas.github.io/projects/coordination/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I researched different facets of coordination in organizations. Firms can use different tools to coordinate internally and with partners. Yet, the &lt;strong&gt;‘mix-and-match’&lt;/strong&gt; of those instruments might prove to be demanding. I am studying this issue in the context of innovation management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the setting of IP strategic management, I examine the combination of &lt;strong&gt;tools to coordinate the tasks’ structure with those to incentivize effort&lt;/strong&gt; in the patents’ value chain. With Dennis Verhoeven (KU Leuven), we find that for a sample of 20 large organizations, coordination arises from three clusters of tools’ configurations. Each configuration highlights a distinct ‘mix-and-match’ in such a way as to enhance the qualities of paired tools and improve both the granting rate and speed for the patents portfolio. If you are interested in knowing more, read our working paper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another facet of coordination is the strategic management of &lt;strong&gt;partnerships&lt;/strong&gt;. This issue is particularly relevant for innovation projects, where competences and capabilities may be not available in-house. With the outsourcing of tasks and processes, part of the &lt;strong&gt;responsibility&lt;/strong&gt; for the products’ or services’ features shifts in the partners’ hands. That poses a natural challenge for the outsourcing organization, which loses full directionality and can maintain only partial supervision. How to take back control and insure a smooth coordination with the partners? With Dominique Demougin (TU Kaiserslrautern), we study how to solve this issue via the &lt;strong&gt;negotiation of indemnity clauses in outsourcing contracts&lt;/strong&gt; with a formal model and an empirical analysis for the pharmaceutical industry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coordination is also crucial to alliances&amp;rsquo; survival. &lt;strong&gt;Trust building and maintenance&lt;/strong&gt; enable &lt;strong&gt;strategic alliances&lt;/strong&gt; to survive when allies are peers and the partnerships unstable. My co-authors and I research this relationship with a lab experiment and document the significance of &amp;lsquo;&amp;rsquo;trust-building&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; in initial stages and &amp;lsquo;&amp;rsquo;trust repair&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; in later stages of strategic alliances with competitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>